The article notes that social partnership as an active economic phenomenon corresponds to the main categories of institutionalism and the Labor Code defines the norms of social partnership in the country, ensuring an alignment of the interests of its members with labor relations and other directly related issues. According to the author, social partnership acts as a regulator and institution for a development of economic relations and an integration of interests of participants in economic relations, and also emphasizes a correctness of institutional approach to social partnership. The article also highlights the role of the state as a key institution for an adoption of legal instruments, determination of a legal status of participants in social partnerships, ensuring the process of settling conflicts between participants in social partnership.
social partnership, neoinstitutionalism, socio-economic relations, Republic of Tajikistan, government institutions, social and labor sphere, human capital
1. Gadjiyev E. M. Institutional-Cultural Differences in Economy Development: Issues of Theory and Methodology. Synopsis of candidate dissertation in economics: 08.00.05. – Kazan, 2005. – 24 pp.
2. North D. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. -Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.-236 pp.
3. Lavrov P. L. Essays on Practical Philosophy Issues // Russian Philosophy of Property (XVIII-XX cc.). – Spb: Ganza, 1993. – 413 pp.
4. Nort D. Institutes, Institutional Alteration and Economy Functioning. – M.: Fund of “Initiations” Book on Economics, 1997. – 378 pp.
5. Inshakov O., Frolov D. The Place of Institutionalism in the Science of Economics // Economist, N10, 2005. – PP. 39-44.
6. Labor Code of Tajikistan Republic. Chapter 29, article 31. – p. 102
7. Oleynik A. Institutional Economy. – M.: 2001. – 316 pp.
8. Monroe K. A Fat Lady in a Corset: Altruism and Social Theory/ - American Journal of Political Science, 1994.- PP. 28-48.
9. Ilyenkov E. Philosophy and Culture. – M., 1991. – 278 pp.