Green diplomacy is currently a priority policy area for most states, as it is seen as a key tool for combating climate change and the destruction of ecosystems.The emergence and development of this direction is based on the norms of international environmental law, the ideas of sustainable development and the principle of harmonious coexistence between man and nature.Green diplomacy is gradually becoming a central aspect of international relations, influencing the development of new norms, agreements, and political mechanisms for interaction.Theoretical paradigms within the framework of political realism and liberalism, as well as modern green political thought and other schools that have formed the conceptual foundations of green diplomacy are analyzed.Their contribution to the transformation of foreign policy strategies of states is considered, and the importance of environmental cooperation in strengthening global security is demonstrated.The concepts of “norm”, “ethics”, “power”, “economic interests” and other aspects of international politics are also analyzed.
green diplomacy, international relations, the theoretical paradigms, political realism, liberalism, green political thought, climate change
1. Carson, R. Silent Spring / trans. L. V. Beskrovnaya. Moscow: Progress, 1974. 279 pp. PP. 13.
2. Dobson, A. Green Political Thought. 4th ed. London: Routledge, 2007. 240 pp. DOI: 10.4324/9780203964620.
3. Eckersley, R. The Green State: Rethinking Democracy and Sovereignty. Cambridge, MA; London: MIT Press, 2004. PP. 12, 18.
4. Eckersley, R. The Green State: Rethinking Democracy and Sovereignty. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2004. 298 pp.
5. Frederick, M. “Environmental Security: Demystifying the Concept, Clarifying the Stakes.” Environmental Change and Security Project Report, 1995, no. 1, PP. 14–23. URL: https://www.wilsoncenter.org/sites/default/files/media/documents/publication/report1a.pdf (date of appeal: 10.10.2025).
6. Hobbes, T. Leviathan, or the Matter, Form and Power of a Commonwealth Ecclesiastical and Civil [Electronic resource]. Moscow: Electronic Library “Civil Society”, n.d. URL: https://www.civisbook.ru/files/File/Gobbs_Leviafan.pdf (date of appeal: 14.07.2025).
7. Kant, I. Perpetual Peace (1795). In: Kant. Selected Works, 1966, no. 3.
8. Keohane, R. O. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton University Press, 2005.
9. Keohane, R. O., Nye, J. S. Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. Boston: Little, Brown, 1977. 273 pp.
10.Lieven, A. “Climate Change and the State: A Case for Environmental Realism.” Survival, 2020, vol. 62, no. 2, PP. 7–26. DOI: 10.1080/00396338.2020.1739945. URL: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00396338.2020.1739945 (date of appeal: 10.10.2025).
11.Locke, J. Second Treatise, §§ 25–51, 123–126 [Electronic resource]. Chicago: Press-Pubs of University of Chicago, n.d. URL: https://presspubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/v1ch16s3.html
12.Machiavelli, N. The Prince / trans. G. Muraviova. Moscow: Eksmo, 2023. 448 pp.
13.Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., Behrens, W. W. The Limits to Growth: A Report for the Club of Rome’s Project on the Predicament of Mankind. New York: Universe Books, 1972. 205 pp.
14.Morgenthau, H. J. Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. 6th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1985. 434 pp.
15.Thucydides. History of the Peloponnesian War / trans. F. G. Mishchenko. Moscow: Nauka, 1999. Book V, Chapter 89, PP. 327. (date of appeal: 14.10.2025).
16.Voskanyan, E. “Rashid Ismailov: ‘Russia Does Not Use the Soft Power of Green Diplomacy Enough’.” Ekovestnik, May 28, 2019. URL: http://ekovestnik.ru/article/377701/ (date of appeal: 15.05.2020).
17. Wilson, W. Fourteen Points. Speech by U.S. President Woodrow Wilson at the Joint Session of Congress, January 8, 1918 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/wilson14.asp (date of appeal: 15.10.2025).